|
A
group of rave enthusiasts run across another cannister of zombie-creating
chemical the evil military created and lost. They analyze the
substance and find it makes for one hell of a high, so they start
peddling and planning a rave to raise cash and have fun. Of course
all the users of "Z" eventually become zombies and the
fun begins.
This
one starts off on the wrong foot, it has several of the same actors
as RotLD4: Necropolis, and they're playing the same characters
with the same uncle, but seem to have no memory of what happened
there. Maybe this was written by people who didn't watch the last
one, or are retarded. But you can easily see why this can cause
credibility problems, especially when they were made back to back
like these were. It shows the filmmakers were completely aware
that they were making crap and didn't mind. At least they're comfortable
with their station. Gotta respect that. Well, I guess not.
This
movie really does fall flat, though. The zombies are at no time
ominous or foreboding, more like ridiculous, but not played for
laughs. Just ridiculous in a way that makes you say, "damn,
that's just fuckin' ridiculous." What I'm trying to convey
is how stupid the story is and how badly it's pulled off in most
aspects.
The
acting is seriously annoying. Again, not just bad, but bad in
a way that makes you say... ah, you get the point. Lots of the
people in this movie really need to look into a career in grocery
bagging or something where they can be productive. Not all, mind
you, but several.
Also
the characters are single dimension stereotypes that will impress
with their shititude. Note the drug dealer for an example.
Return
of the Living Dead 5: Rave to the Grave does solve the eternal
controversy over slow versus fast zombies. It has both, and there's
no reason or rhyme as to why some shamble while others run, well
there is, it's because the people who made this film either really
didn't give a fuck or are retarded (see above). Also the zombies
talk about eating brains, but never do, they just eat scalps.
On
the good side, there's some nice gore and most the zombies look
really great. Also there's nudity, something I thought was forever
gone from horror. Not enough to make me like the flick, though.
The
reason I'm so hard on this film and my insults are so insulting
is because I see so many people make horror films with little
resources that could have been good if they had a few more bucks
to put into 'em, and these guys clearly had some bank available
but instead of making something decent they just banged some shit
out and called 'em sequels. When non-horror fans point out that
horror flicks are all formulaic crap that's just thrown together
for a quick buck, this is an example of them being right. Still,
it's slightly better than the last one and Peter Coyote doesn't
act like a weirdo in this one.
3
out of 10 true pains in the ass.
|